Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > Ben Finney writes ("Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright > in adopted package"): > > Are there messages in that file that could be removed? I typically > > try to get a single message from the copyright holder, that contains > > an explicit and unambiguous grant of a specific license. > > I think it is better not to bother upstream with pointless > administrivia.
Given an appropriate definition of “pointless administrivia”, of course I agree with that. I'm responding (belatedly) to your request for feedback on the *existing* record of correspondence :-) -- \ “… no testimony can be admitted which is contrary to reason; | `\ reason is founded on the evidence of our senses.” —Percy Bysshe | _o__) Shelley, _The Necessity of Atheism_, 1811 | Ben Finney