On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Dominique Pfister wrote:
That's a good point. It makes no sense to have both bindings - REST and SOAP - translate their calls into JCR API, but rather have a generic CMIS to JCR adapter that can be plugged into either of the two binding implementations.
Okay, but let's do better than the initial CMIS specs and stop calling it a REST binding. REST is not a protocol. Please just call it an AtomPub binding. Also, I don't think we should implement any of the HTTP extensions in the AtomPub binding -- they are neither necessary nor desirable. We should show the TC how to implement it right, not just implement whatever they suggest. ....Roy
