I was hit by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1478 (updatesite
resolver sets ext token to empty rather than jar);
also, it seems illogical that jars directory in the cache contains jar.pack
files, whereas the actual jar files are in jars_unpacked...
anybody interested to discuss?

Gintas

2016-12-22 20:57 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com>:

> Is the version number agreed upon? For IvyDE builds think the latest
> version of Ivy is 2.5.0.alpha_20161213000915
>
> Gintas
>
>
> 2016-12-15 17:53 GMT+01:00 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I'd definitely agree with the consistency principle.
>>
>> On 15 December 2016 at 01:38, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2016-12-14, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> >
>> > > When it comes to version numbers, I'm more concerned about following
>> > > semantic versioning than whether or not it's a major release. Bugfixes
>> > > warrant micro version updates, while new features warrant minor
>> version
>> > > updates (and backward incompatible API changes are for the major
>> > version).
>> >
>> > I'm not sure how Ivy has decided on its version numbers in the past, but
>> > for Ant we've never followed semantic versioning that strictly. In
>> > particular we've created lots of micro releases that contained new
>> > features and most of the time created minor versions when we changed JDK
>> > requirements. In a sense we've shifted semantic versioning to the right
>> > and never created major releases (and neither pure bugfix releases),
>> > maybe because Ant2 could bring up some ghosts of the far past. :-)
>> >
>> > As much as I like semantic versioning (and use it in other projects),
>> > I'd prefer to stay consistent with the way versions have been used in
>> > prior releases.
>> >
>> > Stefan
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to