Jason Dillon wrote:
I'm now a little bit disturbed that you now think that based on my
response that I am not open to questions... which I really can't see
how you came to that based on the words I used in my response.
Maybe it is starting your response with the word "What?". I could have
interpreted it completely differently to how you intended, but it did
not make you seem friendly and approachable.
While I'm on this thread, is the AntHill license specific to the
Apache Geronimo project? Or a general for Open Source project use? I
think it would be a good idea to notify the project and/or pmc if we
are obtaining licenses for use by the project...
As I mentioned in the initial email, the AntHill license is very
similar to that of JIRA or Confluence... they grant licenses for use
by open-source projects.
Can the full text of the open source license be sent to the PMC for vetting?
I had hopped to get a more perfect and complete system before I
brought this to the community... though I'm not sure that would have
mattered much. Probably more that the tool is not open-source is why
you even mention this. If I did something similar with CC or
Continuum no one would even mention it. Too bad neither of those
tools is comprehensive enough to do the job though... but maybe if we
wait for a few more years they will be closer.
:-P
Maybe I need an apple mail plugin to randomly insert emotions into
mail so that folks don't think that I am being harsh...
Maybe :-) Everyone doesn't have the same thickness of skin.
Regards,
John
blah... email really sucks as an effective communication medium.
:-(
--jason
