On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
As I mentioned in the initial email, the AntHill license is very
similar to that of JIRA or Confluence... they grant licenses for
use by open-source projects.
I had hopped to get a more perfect and complete system before I
brought this to the community... though I'm not sure that would
have mattered much. Probably more that the tool is not open-source
is why you even mention this. If I did something similar with CC
or Continuum no one would even mention it. Too bad neither of
those tools is comprehensive enough to do the job though... but
maybe if we wait for a few more years they will be closer.
No, I wasn't really concerned about the tool not being open-source.
More concerned about what the license is... I saw "Licensed TO Apache
Geronimo TO BUILD OPEN-SOURCE PROJECTS ONLY". I'd like to be sure the
license terms (restrictions, etc) are communicated with the group.
So, we can understand the terms and ensure we follow them -- you
never know when the big one will hit the Bay Area... :-P
--kevan
