Daniel Gruno wrote:
> So, this is when we get to vote on things!
> I am satisfied that the new site is working as intended, and that new
> requests for features can be integrated and reviewed, as the site is
> publicly available in svn (in the infrastructure repository).
> 
> Now, the vote deals with a lot of things, so I'd like you to read the
> proposal carefully.
> 
> --------
> Proposal
> --------
> 1) Move the current modules.apache.org to modules-archive.apache.org
> 2) Create a link on both modules.apache.org and
> modules-archive.apache.org linking to each other.
> 3) Replace modules.apache.org with the new modules site, currently
> available at http://modules.humbedooh.com and also available in svn for
> review.
> 4) Start afresh with a new, empty database on modules.apache.org and
> have modules-archive.apache.org retain the old database.
> 5) Contact all authors who have created or modified a module on the site
> within the last 2 years (this is 59 authors), and inform them of the new
> site, encouraging them to resubmit their modules.
> 6) Allow modules.apache.org to fetch DOAP files for projects, placed
> anywhere on the Internet, thus acting as an aggregator of publicly
> available information.
> 
> 
> ----
> Vote
> ----
> 
> [ X ] +1: I support this proposal
> [  ]  0: I don't care
> [  ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because...
> 
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, thus ending, at
> earliest, on Monday, January 28th, 13:20 GMT.
> Standard majority consensus applies, as it has with all other web site
> changes.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel.
> 


Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to