On 24.01.13 14:58 , Daniel Gruno wrote: > so it's a trade-off between simplicity and complexity. > For me, the browse feature should just be a > fast way to see the most popular modules in each respective category, > not in any way a complex tool for searching, as the search feature does > that just fine.
I agree. As I said I just wanted to mention it, since it stuck out as an inconsistency. But you have already put a lot of thought into it... When giving feedback I usually reverse the situation. e.g. what would help me and/or what would trigger a certain thought process or response. Mission acomplished. :-) > Ideas are always welcome, in fact the entire web site is available in > Subversion for those interested, But as I said earlier, perhaps that's > better suited for another thread (I'll be sure to post such a thread > once we actually start migrating). I believe we can both implement and > improve the new system at the same time, one thing doesn't have to put a > stop to the other. As soon as the new site is online, I'll look out for a new thread or send you an email. Cheers. -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek lookup http://sks.pkqs.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D /* Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness await thee at its end. */
