Eric Stadtherr wrote: > I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so I'd like > to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288 contains a fix I made > to the code that manages the results of the server-side sorting Although > the fix is working, it seems that it negatively impacted the behavior in > the absence of "SORT" capability on the IMAP server. > > I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the messages > in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order the messages > arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an easy patch to > restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent. How does that > sound?
Sounds good to me. Hopefully it will be an easy fix! If you need me to try any patches, let me know. Thanks, Jim
