On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:53:49 -0400, Jim Pingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Stadtherr wrote: >> I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so I'd like >> to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288 contains a fix I made >> to the code that manages the results of the server-side sorting Although >> the fix is working, it seems that it negatively impacted the behavior in >> the absence of "SORT" capability on the IMAP server. >> >> I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the messages >> in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order the messages >> arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an easy patch to >> restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent. How does that >> sound? > > > Sounds good to me. Hopefully it will be an easy fix! > > If you need me to try any patches, let me know.
I agree, I'd rather have if fixed than making it another config option -- also I'm open for testing patches against Dovecot, just let me know. Thanks P > > Thanks, > Jim > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- http://fak3r.com - you don't have to kick it -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
