On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:07:00 -0600, Eric Stadtherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so
> I'd like to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288
> contains a fix I made to the code that manages the results of the
> server-side sorting Although the fix is working, it seems that it
> negatively impacted the behavior in the absence of "SORT" capability
> on the IMAP server.
>
> I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the
> messages in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order
> the messages arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an
> easy patch to restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent.
> How does that sound?
For me date order and arravial order are two different ways of sorting messages.
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' ||
Centro de Telemática | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador,
del Litoral | Administrador
---------------------------------------------------------
