On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:55:07 -0700, Andrew Fladmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I've applied your patch and it solved the issue I was having with sorting > in my mailboxes. I'm not sure why the server-side sorting isn't working > for me, given that hMailserver supports it.. but I'll dig into that > separately.
Has this already been applied to trunk? I ask because I just checked out a fresh copy from svn and everything works now; sorting is good to go. P > Thanks!! > > Andrew > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:14:26 -0600, Eric Stadtherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> All, >> >> I have a patch that restores the message sorting behavior in cases >> where the IMAP server does not support the "SORT" command: >> >> http://stadtherr.bounceme.net/files/imap_no_sort.patch [1] >> It was created against a working copy of Subversion rev288. >> >> Sorry for the goofup - I didn't have a non-sorting IMAP server >> to test with! >> >> -Eric >> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:07:00 -0600, Eric Stadtherr wrote: >> I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so >> I'd like to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288 >> contains a fix I made to the code that manages the results of the >> server-side sorting. Although the fix is working, it seems that it >> negatively impacted the behavior in the absence of "SORT" capability >> on the IMAP server. >> >> I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the >> messages in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order >> the messages arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an >> easy patch to restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent. >> How does that sound? >> >> -Eric >> >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:34:04 -0400, Jim Pingle wrote: >> I updated from SVN version 285 to 288, and in doing so I now have >> problems >> with the message sort order on BincIMAP. It's working fine on my >> Courier server. >> >> What happens is that the messages in the inbox are in random order, >> even >> though the "date" column header is highlighted. If it refreshes to >> check new >> mail and finds something, it does go at the top. However, once you >> reload >> the page the messages return to their previous order. The order >> doesn't >> correspond to any discernible pattern. >> >> If I move back and forth between pages, the messages stay in the same >> order. >> >> BincIMAP does not support server-side sorting, so the usual sort >> functions >> in Roundcube are disabled (column headers are not clickable.) Perhaps >> there >> needs to be an additional capability check that can default back to >> client-side sorting in this case? >> >> I really, really wish I didn't have to deal with BincIMAP, but I >> guess it >> does help to hunt down bugs in lesser-used code paths... >> >> Jim >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] http://www.orbitalmail.com/../files/imap_no_sort.patch >> > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- http://fak3r.com - you don't have to kick it -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
