Yep.. you are probably right. We could ask but I doubt they would allow it ...
manfred > I think we can't go with the raven.... > > http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/3/prweb9334175.htm > > Given that a different non-competing user of the name is using a raven in > their logo > > On Friday, 20 December 2013, Manfred Moser wrote: > >> > >> > On Dec 20, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Manfred Moser >> <manf...@simpligility.com<javascript:;> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I would move the Raven closer to the word Maven but otherwise this >> looks >> >> good imho. Of course I am not sure if everyone would recognize it as >> a >> >> raven .. >> > >> > Thats my problem . doesnt look like a raven to me at all. >> > >> > When I first looked at it, I guess the mouth + tough part seemed to >> look >> > more like the Seattle SeaHawks logo stuck on a boot with a weird >> swirly >> > thing at the ankle. >> > >> > In other words, a little to abstract for me. :-) >> >> Fair enough. I guess living in the pacific northwest I am exposed to >> these >> depictions a lot so I can tell. But globally we might have to make it a >> bit clearer. Good input ;-) >> >> manfred >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> <javascript:;> >> >> > > -- > Sent from my phone > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
