I meant that the mina-core jar keeps the ByteBuffer implementation, and -for those that want only to use the Mina ByteBuffer- a separate ByteBuffer jar. But it's not needed for the Mina framework.
-- Jeroen Brattinga 2007/1/21, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/21/07, Jeroen Brattinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1 > > I don't really see the point in an extra jar for the ByteBuffer. If you > want > users to be able to use the powerful Mina ByteBuffer, why not release an > independent jar just for this goal? What do you mean by 'independent jar'? Is it something different from what I said? Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
