On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> The page provides relevant information in a bad way (tone and wording of > >> the above list would be OK, for example). It is by keeping it as it is > that > >> we play the game of haters. I'll propose a rewrite next weekend. > > > > > > That sounds a good move, Andrea. However, one question that needs asking > is > > why the AOO project (as opoosed to Apache in general) needs this page at > > all. Now that LibreOffice uses the Mozilla license (which is not known > for > > compliance risks), which GPL-licensed suite is this page helping users > > avoid? > > > > There is no mention of LO on this page, nor any suggestion of it. >
I did not say it did. I am a regular contributor to this project and my comments are in that capacity, not as a representative of anyone else. My question stands. S.
