If you can be more specific on what exactly is not well documented enough to be easy to set up, we will surely enhance the documentation in these areas. However, we have already improved it since the last conversation about this issue a few months ago.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Ryan Baxter [mailto:rbaxte...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Mai 2014 16:17 An: dev@shindig.apache.org Betreff: Re: Review of Neo4j patch I echo Stanton's comments. The last time I tried to use the patch I was still having trouble figuring out how to get everything up and running. I can try to find some time to take a look again. Sorry to be so slow on this. On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi René, > > I'm sorry that this has been your experience. Please don't interpret > the slow-moving process as a lack of appreciation for the work you've > done. It is very much appreciated, I promise you. > > Given the state of the patch and the conversation on the review, I > think we need to just get this committed so that work can continue in > smaller, more manageable chunks. > > For my own part, I'll aim to play around with things over the upcoming > long weekend here in the states. > > Thanks, > -Stanton > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM, René Peinl > <rene.pe...@hof-university.de>wrote: > >> Dear Shindig Community, >> >> I’d like to bring our contribution regarding a proper database >> backend for Apache Shindig to your attention. >> >> As some of you might know, we already posted an initial patch over a >> year ago. It turned out, that it was not feasible to include this in >> Shindig due to licensing issues that we were not aware of before. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1911 >> >> A few months later we asked via the mailing list, whether you would >> be still interested in getting a patch which circumvents these issues >> and I received positive feedback from you. >> >> 4 months ago, we posted a new version of the patch which sorted out >> the licensing issues and had some other significant enhancements >> regarding multi-threading, multiple concurrent connections and things >> like that, that make it ready for larger installations with multiple db >> servers. >> >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9773/ >> >> Initially, Ryan Baxter gave us some good hints regarding minor issues >> with documentation and installation. We’ve sorted them out, but >> during the last three months there were no visible efforts from the >> Shindig-side to really bring this patch into the main code. We are >> still committed to support and further enhance it, so if there are >> reasonable issues, please let us know. >> >> >> >> I’d like to communicate my frustration and disappointment about the >> procedure. I don’t know the reasons for the way this issue is handled >> and I’m sure you all have important things to do, but I can’t imagine >> how any open source project can work that simply ignores >> contributions worth several person months of work. >> >> Please give this patch a fair chance. >> >> Regards >> >> René >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Prof. Dr. René Peinl >> >> Teaching area: architecture of Web applications >> >> Hof University >> >> Alfons-Goppel-Platz 1 >> >> 95028 Hof >> >> Germany >> >> >> >> Tel: +49 9281 409-4820 >> >> mailto: <mailto:rene.pe...@hof-university.de> >> rene.pe...@hof-university.de >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
