Rene see some of the questions I had in the review https://reviews.apache.org/r/9773/
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:45 AM, René Peinl <rene.pe...@hof-university.de> wrote: > If you can be more specific on what exactly is not well documented enough to > be easy to set up, we will surely enhance the documentation in these areas. > However, we have already improved it since the last conversation about this > issue a few months ago. > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Ryan Baxter [mailto:rbaxte...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Mai 2014 16:17 > An: dev@shindig.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Review of Neo4j patch > > I echo Stanton's comments. The last time I tried to use the patch I was > still having trouble figuring out how to get everything up and running. I > can try to find some time to take a look again. Sorry to be so slow on this. > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi René, >> >> I'm sorry that this has been your experience. Please don't interpret >> the slow-moving process as a lack of appreciation for the work you've >> done. It is very much appreciated, I promise you. >> >> Given the state of the patch and the conversation on the review, I >> think we need to just get this committed so that work can continue in >> smaller, more manageable chunks. >> >> For my own part, I'll aim to play around with things over the upcoming >> long weekend here in the states. >> >> Thanks, >> -Stanton >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM, René Peinl >> <rene.pe...@hof-university.de>wrote: >> >>> Dear Shindig Community, >>> >>> I’d like to bring our contribution regarding a proper database >>> backend for Apache Shindig to your attention. >>> >>> As some of you might know, we already posted an initial patch over a >>> year ago. It turned out, that it was not feasible to include this in >>> Shindig due to licensing issues that we were not aware of before. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1911 >>> >>> A few months later we asked via the mailing list, whether you would >>> be still interested in getting a patch which circumvents these issues >>> and I received positive feedback from you. >>> >>> 4 months ago, we posted a new version of the patch which sorted out >>> the licensing issues and had some other significant enhancements >>> regarding multi-threading, multiple concurrent connections and things >>> like that, that make it ready for larger installations with multiple db >>> servers. >>> >>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9773/ >>> >>> Initially, Ryan Baxter gave us some good hints regarding minor issues >>> with documentation and installation. We’ve sorted them out, but >>> during the last three months there were no visible efforts from the >>> Shindig-side to really bring this patch into the main code. We are >>> still committed to support and further enhance it, so if there are >>> reasonable issues, please let us know. >>> >>> >>> >>> I’d like to communicate my frustration and disappointment about the >>> procedure. I don’t know the reasons for the way this issue is handled >>> and I’m sure you all have important things to do, but I can’t imagine >>> how any open source project can work that simply ignores >>> contributions worth several person months of work. >>> >>> Please give this patch a fair chance. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> René >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Prof. Dr. René Peinl >>> >>> Teaching area: architecture of Web applications >>> >>> Hof University >>> >>> Alfons-Goppel-Platz 1 >>> >>> 95028 Hof >>> >>> Germany >>> >>> >>> >>> Tel: +49 9281 409-4820 >>> >>> mailto: <mailto:rene.pe...@hof-university.de> >>> rene.pe...@hof-university.de >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
