I am also all for it.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm all for it. I think the Shindig community can work in a review capacity > at least. > > Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos. > On Jun 10, 2014 7:46 AM, "Ryan Baxter" <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > > > That is unfortunate. As I am sure you are aware we usually do things > > via consensus and would take a vote on something like this. It is > > very rare (in my observation) that one person speaks for the entire > > community. I assume everyone will back it, but still it is better to > > do things the "right way". I will wait until tonight until making any > > decision to give everyone else the change to way in. > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 10/06/14 02:13, Ryan Baxter wrote: > > >> > > >> Thanks for reaching out Andy. Is there any way we can get an > > >> extension on the deadline? I would like to put this out for a vote to > > >> the Shindig community but we usually give everyone 3 days to review > > >> and vote. Since there is a very short runway on this I am not sure > > >> everyone will have time to review. > > >> > > > > > > Not really - it's determined by W3C and because they have announced a > > > deadline they will be keen to stick to it. > > > > > > This is just a request for support - it does not actually commit the > > project > > > to do anything specific. > > > > > > If you are implementing a spec, or a part of a spec, then not ticking > the > > > first 3 "intends" would be routine. > > > > > > You can include a brief (one sentence-ish) advertising for your work. > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi there, > > >>> > > >>> W3C are looking for support in creating an Open Social WG. > > >>> > > >>> ASF is a member of W3C and can express such support (I'm the W3C AC > rep > > >>> for > > >>> Apache - I push web buttons). > > >>> > > >>> I've had a request from Harry Halpin to add support - if this > projects > > >>> wants > > >>> me to go ahead and express support, please let me know - the deadline > > is > > >>> 23:59, Boston time on 2014-06-10. > > >>> > > >>> the question are below: > > >>> > > >>> Activity: > > >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-activity-proposal.html > > >>> Working Group: > > >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html > > >>> Interst Group: > > >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-ig-charter.html > > >>> > > >>> The survey covers: > > >>> > > >>> Q1::Support for the Proposal > > >>> > > >>> (choose one - can add a comment): > > >>> > > >>> My organization: > > >>> * supports this Activity Proposal as is. > > >>> > > >>> * suggests changes to this Activity Proposal, but supports the > proposal > > >>> whether or not the changes are adopted (your details below). > > >>> > > >>> * suggests changes to this Activity Proposal, and only supports the > > >>> proposal > > >>> if the changes are adopted [Formal Objection] (your details below). > > >>> > > >>> * opposes this Activity Proposal and requests that this group be > closed > > >>> [Formal Objection] (your details below). > > >>> * abstains from this review. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Q2:: Support for Deliverables of the group > > >>> (choose any that apply - can add a comment) > > >>> > > >>> My organization: > > >>> * intends to review drafts as they are published and send comments. > > >>> * intends to develop experimental implementations and send experience > > >>> reports (your details below). > > >>> * intends to develop products based on this work (your details > below). > > >>> * intends to apply this technology in our operations. > > >>> * would be interested in participating in any press activity > connected > > >>> with > > >>> this group. > > >>> > > >>> Andy > > >>> VP W3C Relations. > > >>> > > > > > >
