i think there are no really major showstoppers at the moment. (as far as i know) And whats the difference for you if you just take beta5 now and use that in your production or if we already called that final? It will be the same kind of code. There isn't anything different then the label we give it..
What is importand for you is do all your pages work are you seeing unexpected features? johan On 10/21/07, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, i'd love to start seeing RCs. We're shooting for a late november > release and I'd *really* like to see something final soon. It makes me a > little nervous to be still in beta at this point in our release > cycle. I'm > not complaining, really. I know you guys are busy and are working on this > and other things. Just trying to put in my 2 cents in favor of cutting a > final release in the absence of any major show stoppers. > > On 10/20/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i am not aware of any "show-stopping" bugs, so i am ok if the next > > release is an RC1. > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 10/20/07, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > alright, then we should somehow make it official. > > > also to communicate to "potential" users that the final release is > > getting > > > closer. > > > > > > anyway, what do the others think? (weekends are a bad time to have a > > lively > > > discussion ;) ) > > > > > > Gerolf > > > > > > On 10/20/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > i am already in ff mode. except optimalisations like we did this few > > > > days. optimisations should always be right after major changes and > > > > freezzz > > > > > > > > On 10/20/07, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 10/20/07, dtoffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It's not about specific bugs, it's this little "beta4" that > my > > > > boss > > > > > > don't like. Stable as in "no new features or breaking changes" > is > > > > enough, > > > > > > and as some less important bugs are found, some bugfix could be > > > > released > > > > > > as > > > > > > 1.3.01 for example. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you daniel, that's exactly what i meant. even though there > > already > > > > > people using the betas to build great applications, > > > > > a final release could allow even more folks to use wicket and thus > a > > > > higher > > > > > adoption and penetration of the market. > > > > > > > > > > and as johan said: > > > > > > I am really curious what bugs are really stopping people for > using > > the > > > > > current build... > > > > > > > > > > so how about the feature freeze and 2-3 RCs? > > > > > bugs can be fixed for 1.3.1 and api breaks go directly into TNG. > > > > > > > > > > let's hop on the 1.4-train ;) > > > > > > > > > > Gerolf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
