Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> So, just to be clear, and to eliminate any
> possible misinterpretation, you are
> stating this is a one-person show at
> this time?
The Fedora package review policy states that the submitter automatically
becomes the point of contact of the submitted packages. So, since I
submitted those packages, if they are approved, I will be the one who will
have to approve any comaintainers. By default, there will be none, which is
just how the policy works.
I believe from the discussions that there are already at least 1 or 2 people
interested in comaintaining, but ultimately it is those people who will have
to explicitly sign up for it. I obviously cannot announce somebody as a
comaintainer without the alleged comaintainer's permission.
Any interested people can already request comaintainership now (e.g., by
replying to this mail), and I will almost certainly grant it (though I will
have reservations about some specific types of requests, such as blanket
admin permissions for the entire @kde-sig group), but of course contingent
on the packages being approved (i.e., the FESCo hold on them being lifted,
and the reviews subsequently passing), because there is nothing to
comaintain before that point and also nowhere I can fill in those
comaintainership requests before the dist-git Pagure repository is created.
Kevin Kofler
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
