Your terminology trips you up. As I pointed out, the busy detector was not "incorporated" into SCAMP. It was tested simultaneously.
Rud Merriam K5RUD ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX http://TheHamNetwork.net -----Original Message----- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Bernstein Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 11:23 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Imitating the big guys I don't think there's any confusion or misinformation in referring to the busy detector incorporated in SCAMP as the "SCAMP busy detector". Its not like its ever appeared anywhere else... 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Rud Merriam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SCAMP and busy detection are two entirely different pieces of software and > capability. > > SCAMP took the RDFT image transfer protocol and added pieces to it for file > transfer and ARQ. > > Busy detection was a totally separate activity in parallel with SCAMP. > > Just trying to keep the confusion and subsequent misinformation to a > minimum. > > > Rud Merriam K5RUD > ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX > http://TheHamNetwork.net > > > > It was that way before the SCAMP concepts were known. > > The only thing that has changed is that the community learned that > USING SCAMP there is a POSSIBILITY of avoiding collisions with its > busy detector. > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php Yahoo! Groups Links
