This has been proposed to ARRL by me and several others and was turned
down.  Maybe next century ...  :-)

73, Zack W9SZ


On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Gary Stone wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> Well, for what it is worth here is my thoughts.  I am sitting at 325 and of the 10 I 
> have left, several (3 or 4) have "no likely chance" of operations.  Why keep them on 
> the list? If a country does not allow activity from an entity I would like to see 
> them go off the 'active' list.  However, I do remember a brief operation from Yemen 
> just last year - and I missed that one too.
>  
> This could be handled by starting an 'inactive' list and then using the active list 
> to determine honor roll, etc.  I am not just complaining but really wonder why an 
> entity would be keeping someone from 'top of the honor roll' when there is no 
> possibility of operations from there.  If a legit operation started the entity could 
> be moved back to the active list.  Just an idea - probably full of holes but just an 
> idea.
>  
> It would require some bugs to work out but I think it could happen.  As for me, I 
> have hopes that the 3C0 dx-pedition will put me on honor roll and 'top of the honor 
> roll' is a long way off :-).
>  
> 73 de N5PHT, Gary
> 

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org

Reply via email to