On 5/10/2007 Bernie McClenny, W3UR wrote:
> HS0ZCW, who sometimes operates as K4VUD said "Maybe it is time to re-think > the DXCC status of this place?" <snip> I actually have read the rules - and I think they are rather silly - I follow them, but, if I was running the program, I'd add one simple one The entity must have a permanent human population - defined as having been continuously populated for more 6 months - after 6 months of no one living there, they are removed Yeah - I know it would remove a LOT of entities from the list, but -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! A rose by any other name would be "deadly thorn-bearing assault vegetation." Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
