Bob,
So you think it's a great fabulous program. Then continue using
it. There are other's who want to see some changes. They should
not be subjected from people like you and Art crawling out of
your comfort zones making snarky comments as you did.
By the way that pic on your qrz.com/K8BL is pretty scary.
You should put another one in it's place.
On 1/5/2014 12:23 AM, R.T.Liddy wrote:
Constructive criticism is good, snarky comments are not helpful.
A wish list of new features and/or improvements would be much better
than empty complaints.
The support provided by Jim AD1C has been beyond excellent. I have had
no problem whatsoever with getting thousands of QSOs into LoTW and
eQSL - export them to a file, convert it in TQSL and send it to LoTW. It's
a piece of cake.
Sure, there are a few kinks in DX4WIN, but nothing I can't live with. Overall,
I think it's a fabulous program.
GL/73/HNY Bob K8BL
________________________________
From: n4dsp <n4...@triad.rr.com>
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
Zoran,
You ask me to to give you and other's on this reflector some idea on what
exactly is it that I am looking for.
Let's start with you Zoran. What would you like to see and for what purpose? Or
are you on the dx4win
design team which implements these idea's into reality? Your concrete idea's on
this matter instead of
flaming would be nice.
john
On 1/4/2014 9:23 PM, WA7AA wrote:
On 04.01.2014 11:46, n4dsp wrote:
Why is it and it's not just with this reflector when post's come out like mine
expressing dissatisfaction with DX4WIN and expecting and willing to pay
for revisions, the DX4WIN Addicts come out stating exactly what Erkki stated?
I don't want to get into the flame war here, but maybe you can give us some idea on what
exactly is it that you are looking for as far as DX4Win changing and being "on the
move"? Some concrete examples would be nice instead of flaming, since I am sure
every one if us has a list of wanted features or such. I took a brief look of the DXLab
and frankly, I don't see what is so revolutionary about it, aside from a few features
that may be interesting to have, but are nowhere near making it the pinnacle of a logger
you make it out to be. To draw a parallel to your Win 3.5 metaphor, I don't need a change
that will take me from WinXP to Win 8.
73,
Zoran WA7AA
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net/
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net/
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
