Hi John,Nice reeding your post this early morning. And I agree 100% with you. 
Using dx4win from it's 1st release and despite some small issues I also still 
stick to this logger, fast and easy to use, except during big contests, where 
WinTest beats it and all others. After move to our ex-summer home and our staff 
being in a container for over 6 months during preparation for permanent full 
year living, my shack is still not completely QRV for making QSOs. But, I 
expect to have more time to get it ready in a near future, so we may establish 
a schedule.Last saturday was my 85th anniversary an we were waiting for the 
whole familly to come, but unfortunately only Sasha with his familly managed to 
come, Vladimir's flight was cancelled because of social movements in 
France...Hoping that everything is fine with you and your familly, Mira and 
myself send our 88 and 73 to you and your's, hoping to see you here one 
day.Cheers,Radi

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., mars 30, 2023 à 1:36, John, K9EL<k...@comcast.net> a écrit:   I 
believe most DX4Win users who also operate FT8 would like full
integration.  Most likely that would require adding UDP communication and
Paul says that is not likely to happen, at least not anytime soon.

Fortunately, it is not difficult to add FT8 QSOs to DX4Win.  I create a
shortcut to the WSJT-X (or JTDX) .adi file.  I import that file and it
imports very quickly.  Not ideal, but very easy.

If you need a logging program with real time uploads to Club Log, LOTW, full
integration with other software and other fun things, DX Labs software may
be your choice.  But the learning curve is steep and the number of settings
and options is significant.  DX4Win is very straight forward and so easy to
use.  I want to focus on making QSOs, not spending tons of time on the
logging program.

Just my 2 cents

K9EL



-----Original Message-----
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net <dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net> On
Behalf Of Courtney Judd
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 6:15 PM
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] any upgrades?

I am just sorta on the fence here now since I finally have made the jump to
FT8 and just wondering if DX4WIN is going to be upgraded to handle WSJT-X
like it does with MMTTY. I have been using DX4WIN for many years and now
have 160K+ q's in the log. There are several minor changes I would like to
see but integration of WSJT-X is one that I would like to see. So while I
have been looking at all the windows logging programs now available I don't
really want to move away from DX4WIN if something is in the pipeline. If
nothing coming then I guess I'll be looking at other options. Thanks for
reading 73's Cort K4WI

Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to