On Sep 16 2013 4:54 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 15 September 2013 19:06, EBo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> how about setting up a couple of test programs that do circles and >> Koch >> snowflakes with different segment lengths and recursive depths. >> Then >> you can profile the behaviour better. > > I don't think that the snowflake is a good test, it is made of > genuinely short segments with sharp corners. single-segment lookahead > is perfectly appropriate for that path.
it is a null-model. Both LCNC & Mach (or any others you care to add) should preform equally as well, and THAT is a perfectly appropriate control for a statistical model (as well as the 0'th order snowflake -- a triangle). Other than that, I do agree with you. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
