Well, this is already off topic:

For the hobbyists: These seem promising http://www.rtelligent.net/ECR60.html


For the Commerical Applications:
Sittners repo works well with Bosch/Beckhoff/SMC, there hasn't been any updates 
in almost a year but a few MR's are up.

Beckhoff will recommend a PLC/Safety PLC control talking to linuxcnc through a 
bridge.
This seems to works albeit a 15-20 ms latency from command to movement.


Exploring a few other options as well for Ethercat.


________________________________
From: Bernt Hustad Hembre <bernthustadhem...@gmail.com>
Sent: February 28, 2022 2:40 PM
To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC is in Debian!

Hi all,

I have not used EtherCAT equipment  with LinuxCNC. But I’ve used a Beckhoff
PLC running TC/BSD and TwinCAT. Controlling a whole lot of servomotors.

The equipment from Beckhoff is priced quite a bit over the hobbyist budget.
But is well worth the money for commercial application. And the wide range
of controllers and I/O modules makes it a good choice for any CNC machine.

The modules I’ve used clicks together on a DIN rail. They have a buildt in
bus for etherCAT, 24V and 5V for the electronics. This keeps the need for
additional wiring to a minimum.

I would love to upgrade one of my machines to Beckhoff control systems, but
it is to expencive for my budget. I could borrow some unused equipment from
work to test it out though. That would be fun to try.

Beckhoff love to brag about their eqipment on LinkedIn etc. I guess an
article about LinuxCNCs support for Beckhoff hardware could both «buy» us
good support from Beckhoff, and possible get some more comercial activity
with LinuxCNC. I think we all could benefit from that.


Cheers!
Bernie

man. 28. feb. 2022 kl. 20:34 skrev gene heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>:

> On Monday, February 28, 2022 2:03:30 PM EST Steffen Möller wrote:
> > On 28.02.22 19:44, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 28, 2022 12:53:21 PM EST Steffen Möller wrote:
> > >> On 28.02.22 18:40, gene heskett wrote:
> > >>> On Monday, February 28, 2022 8:28:36 AM EST andy pugh wrote:
> > >>>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:22, Steffen
> > >>>> Möller<steffen_moel...@gmx.de>
> > >>>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> ie, "rtapi" is relevant to uspace and rt builds.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Can you guide me (or someone else surfacing) towards what would
> > >>>>> be
> > >>>>> required to have LinuxCNC readily compatible with that external
> > >>>>> EtherCAT package on Debian?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Personally I know nothing about EtherCAT. I have always been a
> > >>>> little
> > >>>> afraid of the licensing complexities mentioned here:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Etherlab itself is GPLv2, but _using_ it seems to bring a
> > >>>> different
> > >>>> licensing restriction into play. And I don't know enough about
> > >>>> licensing to know if that's a problem.
> > >>>
> > >>> I followed this link, and couldn't find an obvious link to the
> > >>> licensing docs. Am I going blind? Or are they acting like a
> > >>> submarine, ala the compuserve debacle from about 25 years back?
> > >>
> > >> It is in the "Notice" section below that copyright thingy:
> > >> The license above concerns the source code only. Using the EtherCAT
> > >> technology and brand is only permitted in compliance with the
> > >> industrial property and similar rights ofBeckhoff Automation GmbH
> > >> <http://beckhoff.com/>.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Steffen
> > >
> > > Yes, I read that too, Steffen, but failed to find a statement
> > > describing those rights.
> >
> > They did not put anything there, I agree.
> >
> > > Thats precisely why I mentioned the GIF debacle. I'm a
> > > genuine old fart, my history starts in late 1934, with a good memory
> > > about such dishonest goings on. It took maybe 20 hours for gifs to
> > > disappear from the net, totally and completely then, and maybe a week
> > > to fine tune png and get the first version out the door. Where is
> > > compuserve today? A footnote in history at best, but not remembered
> > > with loving thoughts.  We invented the distastefull term "submarine
> > > patent" to describe what happened.
> > >
> > > I don't really want to be involved with an entity that references
> > > additional rights, but doesn't make those readily available.
> > >
> > > Maybe I didn't look hard enough but I did look with the idea of
> > > learning what those additional rights might cost.
> >
> > Nothing, so I was assured.
> >
> I was not specificaly seeking the monetary cost, more the loss of rights,
> which could be far more costly than the monetary cost. As always, keep
> TANSTAAFL in mind.
>
> > I propose we describe what we want to do and then they either agree and
> > make LinuxCNC.org a member or they don't.
>
> That is likely the best idea at this time. If their gear is competitively
> priced it adds another src of good gear.
>
> OTOH, Peter has been very good to us and it doesn't bither me a bot to
> recommend mesa interfaces. Generally they Just Work which is more than I
> can say about others in the field.
>
> Take care Steffen.
>
> > Best,
> > Steffen
> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Emc-developers mailing list
> > >> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> > >
> > > Cheers, Gene Heskett.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-developers mailing list
> > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
>  - Louis D. Brandeis
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to