2009/10/28 Laura Creighton <[email protected]> > In a message of Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:46:39 +0100, "M.-A. Lemburg" writes: > >If we tweak the selection process to start at submission > >time rather than after a deadline, having a fixed number of > >talks would encourage early submissions. > > > >I'm not sure how well this would pan out on the quality > >scale, but it would make organization easier (room selection, > >printing booklets, updating the web site, etc.) and also > >provide potential attendees with more incentive to come to the > >conference. > > > >-- > >Marc-Andre Lemburg > >eGenix.com > > Ah, how are we going to do this? The first X talks submitted > will be the conference - the ones we think are so lousy that > we do not want them at all? >
Last year at our conference we let the attendees vote their talks preference ( or only the people registered to association, I don't remember now )... An option could be to integrate some *extra* for the talks submited earlier.. Something like: final_vote = attendees_votes + days_before_deadline
_______________________________________________ Europython-improve mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
