I have found 2 mistakes it has made. It has caught me on a few errors as well. GPT-4 has a vast database it can access. It clearly can reference a fair number of theories, papers and authors. It is a very good emulator of intelligence. It also is proving to be a decent first check on my work. It might be said it passes some criterion for Turing tests, though I have often thought this idea was old fashioned in a way.
LC On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:50:33 AM UTC-5 John Clark wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 8:10 PM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I spent some time on GPT-4 this afternoon. I wrote about a topic that >> was leading to an inference I had made. Before I wrote on that inference >> GPT made the same inference. > > > Wow! Would I be correct in saying that you gave GPT-4 your own personal > Turing Test and it passed because you couldn't tell if you were conversing > with a machine or a human being with *at least* average intelligence? > > John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis > <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> > 8yh > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f0dbf5db-59c3-4c0a-875c-073b998e34f2n%40googlegroups.com.
