--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This discussion is so twisted by trollism.
Ya know, Edg, you *could* have explained to start with what you tell us in this post. If you were just going to let people guess what your motivations in cornering your intro TM teacher were, you don't really have any business blaming those who got it wrong. Your earlier post made it sound--at least to me--as though you initially wanted TM to be secular. You went on to quote me, apparently as one of the "trolls," yet I went on to point out what you do, that anybody who doesn't think there's a lot about "God" in SBAL has never actually read it.
