28.04.2014 23:05, Carlos H. Cantu wrote: > I think most of them needs basic asynchronous replication, covering > single and multi-master scenarios. For those who needs more complex > scenarios, there are third party comercial tools. Anyway, I'm not the > right person to answer, since I didn't need replication in my projects > so far, so I'll leave this for Jesus or any others to answer. If you > are interested, I can run a poll at firebirdnews.org and firebase > about what users would expect in "native" FB replication.
I believe that polls tend to show what users want, often mismatching with what they need ;-) But I have no objections to the poll, if questions are composed carefully. > I asked Alexey and seems that most of the previous problems are > fixed, but dropping tables with active connections still causes > corruption. Maybe he can give more details. Table used by active connections cannot be dropped. But maybe there are some race conditions yet unknown for us. > Whatever the reason is, if it will not be done, it should not be left > "open". Time for a global tracker cleanup, huh? :-) Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
