вт, 12 окт. 2021 г. в 13:17, Dimitry Sibiryakov <s...@ibphoenix.com>: > > Vlad Khorsun wrote 12.10.2021 12:10: > >> I see no problem with increasing the limit. I see problems with reducing it > >> (someone may use them). So let's start from a small number 63. When we > >> implement partitions we increase it more consciously. > > > > I speak about data type used in ODS for tablespace ID. It seems INT > > should be > > used, not SMALLINT. > > If this field is needed at all. Still there is no answer why tablespace > cannot be identified by name only except "it was done this way 40 years ago".
Why not to suggest PR for this refactoring? -- Roman Simakov Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
