> the changes on the completions into fish upstream. Other shells don't > usually provide completions for foreign programs, for example systemd > provides bash and zsh completions, while fish provides completions for > systemd.
Thats probably because of the popularity/omnipresence of shells like bash. That's why the foreign program authors have an incentive to provide bash completions in order for their program to be more appealing/user-friendly. Till the time fish-shell reaches that level of popularity, I guess we keep on providing completions as part of fish. Just my 2 cents. -mandeep > I'll be back :D > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. > www.restlet.com/download > http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet > _______________________________________________ > Fish-users mailing list > Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
