Martin Spott wrote:
> Hello Melchior,
> 
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> 
> 
>>This is very standard base64 encoding. Every semi-decent mailer should
>>be able to display this. Of course, it would be better in readable
>>ASCII, but I wouldn't say it's crap. Your mailer *is* crap!  :-P
> 
> 
> You know as good as I do that by common practice encoded emails don't
> belong into mailing lists - unless explicitly stated. Today we have
> base64 encoded mails, maybe tomorrow sombody thinks he'd post uuencoded
> mails he and tells us that every semi-decent mailer should be able to
> display this - which is to the same grade correct as your statement is.
> 
> But all this doesn't change the fact that encoded emails in a mailing
> list are a nuisance. I wrote Arthur privately before and he simply
> didn't respond at all. Every semi-decent list member should do this,
> 
> Martin.

Ok, Ok. Enough of this. Clearly we need to send out all of our e-mails
rot13 encoded. It's the only way that nobody has objected to, so it must
be the only sane solution :)

Josh

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to