On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:55 PM, leee wrote: > There is always a risk associated with changing default behaviour > and the bottom line is that there is no immediate need to do so, > nor any overhead incurred by not doing so. > > This just seems like a commonsense policy to me, and was one of the > factors that lead to me stopping work on FG. > > LeeE
Would there be any value in searching the aircraft XML files in CVS to see how many are using the pi-simple-controller ? That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is, though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft. -Stuart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
