> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:55 PM, leee wrote:
> > > There is always a risk associated with changing default
> > > behaviour and the bottom line is that there is no immediate
> > > need to do so, nor any overhead incurred by not doing so.
> > >
> > > This just seems like a commonsense policy to me, and was one of
> > > the factors that lead to me stopping work on FG.
> > >
> > > LeeE
> >
> > Would there be any value in searching the aircraft XML files in
> > CVS to see how many are using the pi-simple-controller ?
> >
> > That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is,
> > though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft.
> >
> > -Stuart
> 
> This is exactly the sort of think I'd hope to see at the end of the
> transition/notification period and just before the default
> behaviour was changed, so that any outstanding occurrences could be
> looked into.
I just greped through the current CVS aircraft and found the following 
results:

51 Aircraft and the generic-autopilot uses the pi-simple-controller

49 of these aircraft and the generic-autopilot uses the pi-simple-controller 
with a Ki of zero aka P-only

the remaining 2 Aircraft use a pi-simple-controller with Ki greater than zero 
and u_min/u_max set. These two are potential candidates for windup errors.
These two aircraft and the respective controllers are 
* b1900d: Vertical speed hold, Descent FPM and IAS hold
* Citation-Bravo: Altitude Hold Stage 1
Looking at the A/P configuration files, I assume that having antiwindup code 
enabled should do no harm but might stabilize these autopilots in case they 
run into a saturated condition.

Torsten

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to