On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, leee wrote: > On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Martin Spott wrote: >> leee wrote: >>> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote: >>>> That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is, >>>> though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft. >>> >>> This is exactly the sort of think I'd hope to see at the end of >>> the transition/notification period and just before the default >>> behaviour was changed, so that any outstanding occurrences >>> could be looked into. >> >> In a continuous process of improving FlightGear there's no point >> in keeping an 'undesired' (or, in some cases even a buggy) >> feature as being the default just because some unknown 3rd party >> software _might_ depend on it. >> If people don't feel like moving on with the times then they're >> free to use old versions of software. If they'd like to stay >> current, then they're going to adjust their 3rd party stuff >> accordingly. >> >> It's as simple as that, >> >> Martin. > > Aha, so all the aircraft that have been developed for FG, and > without which FG would be pretty pointless (unless you only ever > want to fly the C-172) are just "unknown 3rd party stuff" now then? > Do you deliberately twist what people say just so you have something to argue about?
How many times does it need to be explained to you that the system involved is explicitly designed to prevent unwanted behavior? If there is something out there that is broken because of the limits imposed, then it's not FlightGear's problem. The designer did it wrong. They need to fix it. g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me-109F/X Project ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
