How so Julian? Hehe. On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Julian Leviston <jul...@leviston.net> wrote:
> Hehe that's interesting. I'd never associated LTU with modern languages. > I'm not sure why. Possibly because of the archaic UX and UI. It's > incredibly difficult to parse. > > J > > http://www.getcontented.com.au/ - You Need *GetContented *- Get Your > Website Happy. :) > > On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:37 am, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> > wrote: > > David Barbour wrote: > > A proposed stack exchange for programming language theory has reached > commitment phase. It needs two hundred people. If you're interested in PL, > please participate: > > > For those not aware of it, the starting point for discussions of > programming language theory is http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ > > Miles Fidelman > > -- > In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. > In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
