No, anonymity doesn't sucks...I want anonymity because as I said, people don't
want or even can't show up there details.And IMHO, privacy is something that we
would like to have for our safety and everyone else safety...
Those who would like to be known, I suggest them to put the appropriate inof
they may want in the signature.No one, not me at least, would be bothered about
that...
Only bad conduct should be banned, and I suppose that Fossil have got all the
information to stop people.(IP adress, e-mail, etc.)
PS: Hmmm... So no one is interested about my suggest ?(Why don't we go vote for
the behavior we do want for this mailing list)Have a nice WE, everyone.
Best Regards
K.
De : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 24 juin 2016 17h43
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...
On 6/23/2016 9:11 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote:
> Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:24:26 +0200:
>> the tree-like nature of a thread is now gone (isn't it?)
> No, threading should still work. Just start a new thread with a
> different subject. Typically threading is handled by Reference or
> In-Reply-To header analysis.
We now have an example of a fresh thread. Anonymity still sucks, but at
least threading does work.
--
Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/
+1 626 303 1602
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
