Yep. And the same is true with Frank's trolling about the well-definedness of truth. 
Consistency, like reduction and isolation, is a fantastic tool but a bad master. When 
Hanson argues that we must continue to have babies or risk the halt of innovation, it's 
with a fixed backdrop, worldview. Adopting his "coordinate system" is pretty 
easy for me, having been reared in what I expect is a similar context. It's more 
difficult to adopt a radical view. I'm just not a radical. But still, I find myself 
fairly easily slipping into the perspectives of some radicals I've had the privilege to 
read (e.g. Fannon). That might mean I'm inherently unstable, disintegrated, or whatever. 
And maybe that implies I shouldn't be doing any entheogens. Booo! Conservatism is wasted 
on old people. Old people should proudly don and doff various freak flags. And young 
people should cling desperately to their myopia as best they can, exploit their niche 
while their energy maintains.

I just returned from a visit to Utah. The hotel was hosting a reunion of some arbitrary collection of 
ancient Marines. Wow. Just. Wow. All the handicap parking places were full every night ... every one of 
them adorned with various sorts of macho posturing bumper stickers (e.g. "Secured By: F*ck around 
and find out" - or "Smith & Wesson" - or some ironic nonsense about the scourge of 
socialism). Of course, there were a few of us bearded long-hairs in and out of the breakfast area. But 
boy howdy did we get the Evil Eye from the majority of those old farts. I can only imagine what the 
upside down pentagram on my t-shirt might mean to them (maybe that I'm a member of O9A), or the fact 
that I'm the sole escort for a gaggle of Renee's grandkids ... god only knows what heresy I teach those 
kids when nobody's around.

Were I an actual cynic, I'd carry baggies of mushrooms to dose the breakfast 
materials before those fogies even arose. (I'm sure they'd be surprised to find 
out I'm up at the crack of dawn every day.) It'd be Freakin' Hilarious to see 
them *liberated*, prone on the floor in the lobby pondering the beautiful 
shapes in the false ceiling ... or staring deeply into their coffee, watching 
the milk mimic the swirling galaxies.

If Hanson's right about anything, it's a corollary: society advances one 
funeral at a time.

On 10/12/23 10:49, Steve Smith wrote:
I think I agree with this spirit...  and the invocation of a high-dimensional 
(but finitely so) landscape is not only the constraints we live in, but in some 
sense the ones we *choose* to live in?   I think excess/sloppy meaning might be 
another term for a local/temporary increase (or exchange) of dimensionality, 
effectively lowering the thresholds between basins?

In anthropological terms I think we are in "shaman" territory (the perspective/insight to 
selectively shift the dimensions around for the group as-needed)?  Also maybe the point of 
psychedelic/entheogenic substances?  We are reading Pollan's "How to Change your Mind" at 
the moment.

--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to