Le jeudi 26 novembre 2009 à 17:49 +0100, Michael Hallgren a écrit : > Le jeudi 26 novembre 2009 à 17:14 +0100, Radu-Adrian Feurdean a écrit : > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:04:56 +0100, "Michael Hallgren" > > <m.hallg...@free.fr> said: > > > > > D'accord. Mais pourquoi passer par << mauvais >> pour se trouver au << > > > > Parce-que << mauvais >> est vendu par les politiques comme << bien >> et > > legifere en consequence. > > Et que le << bien >> signifie en effet "foutre la paix aux gens", ce que > > les politiques francais sont biologiquement incapables de faire. > > > > Bref, parce-que le << mauvais >> va arriver de toute facon. > > Pas trop positif tout ça... :( > > mh > > >
<quote a uk peer> The success of the Internet is founded on one core engineering principle, that the underlying network machinery is able to transmit packets of data without having to understand the contents of those packets. This flexibility is what distinguishes the Internet from other communications systems. The spectacular growth and innovative services we have seen online, and the future innovation that is to come, rest wholly on this principle. However this fundamental principle is placed in jeopardy by Clause 11 (Obligations to limit Internet access), which would enable the Secretary of State to require that network operators invent and deploy new machinery to inspect all Internet communications, determine which elements do or might infringe copyright, and take selective action against those communications. This would be disastrous to our sector, and disastrous to businesses and individuals that rely on a broad range of Internet communications services. </quote a uk peer> mh > > > --------------------------- > Liste de diffusion du FRnOG > http://www.frnog.org/ > --------------------------- Liste de diffusion du FRnOG http://www.frnog.org/
