Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote (04-06-11 12:33)
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hmm, got that wrong I see now
http://www.networkworld.com/community/apache-president-jim-jagielski-talks-openoffice-org
Which is no problem for me, but obviously I misunderstood your
statement about not talking to the press.
Tell me where in that post anyone from the ASF is openly critical
of TDF or strongly implies that TDF's "ideological" stance will
be a factor in breaking any cooperation.
I did not say that. But it was said of the interview with Meeks, which
we found out not to be true either.
That is the difference. Outwardly and publicly the ASF is stressing
the good and the potential of this effort. Whereas there appears
a concerted effort by others to derail it and portray the ASF as
the pawns of IBM/Oracle or as agents of anti-FOSS/anti-LOo actions.
If that is the feeling you get, there is something wrong.
I do not see any sense in criticizing the ASF, just because they have a
different view. Seems you get hit by pieces flying around that belong in
the IBM - TDF dispute ;-) Sorry about that, maybe a bit more precise
wording (from me and others) here and there would help, but I'm not sure
if it would fully prevent that happening.
Cor
--
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
