Sorry that it took so long to answer, but I was quiet busy with real life.
Mike Auty wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tiziano Müller wrote: > | Hi everyone > | > | What do you think of creating a new 'virtualization' project or > | herd/team? > > Sounds like a good idea, there seem to be enough packages to warrant it. > ~ Especially if you're finding shared packages and space for integration > of components. Good :-) > > | So, what do you think? > > As one of the primary vmware devs, I'm not sure that vmware easily fits > into this group based on it's closed-source nature, and the complex (but > just about workable) module system we've put in place. I also wouldn't > want to muddy the virtualization email address with all the random > vmware module bugs... 5:) > > I'm pretty happy for the vmware group to go under the virtualization > herd, but I'd very much like to maintain the vmware email > alias/assignment for bugs, and I'm not sure how much we'd be able to > integrate with the larger group. Do you think it's worthwhile vmware > joining the umbrella or should we just stay separate? That's true. How about having a virtualization project which takes care of the common part, the docs and the coordination (if any) and have separate herds for larger "subprojects"? Cheers, Tiziano -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
