The KDE team seems to work on that too :
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2

Now I understand why some devs are working hard to make Mdev working with
OpenRC.

They want to replace Udev/SystemD with Mdev/OpenRC and solve this situation.

Sylvain aka d2_racing

2012/8/7 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org>

> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote:
> > Yes, but if the upstream that is Gnome decides to start depending on
> > systemd features then that's their decision, and the place to discuss
> > if it's good or bad (more important, the place to change it!) would
> > be within the Gnome project.
>
> More or less, but again my goal was not to start another discussion -
> just to inform.  Anybody inclined to comment on whether this is good
> or bad should go look at the list archives and see if any of the 400
> messages in the last month already covered their points.
>
> >
> > I guess Gentoo will always continue to offer the best of upstream.
>
> I don't think Gentoo has to limit itself to what upstream supports (I
> don't think anybody would look at Prefix and say that this was what
> any upstream had in mind).  However, the bottom line is that to do
> something exotic takes effort, so nothing will happen unless somebody
> makes it happen.
>
> >
> > OTOH, if upstream goes and make some change that means a regression
> > for Gentoo users, then they deserve bug report floods from their users!
> :)
>
> Perhaps, but don't count on it going anywhere.  With Gnome 3 they must
> already have pretty thick skin.  I suspect upstream would say that if
> you want a smooth desktop experience you shouldn't be running Gentoo.
> To some degree they probably even have a valid point.  Gentoo is about
> more than a just-works desktop so I think the best we'll be able to
> offer is a "reasonable" experience.  If things get really integrated
> you might see some Sabayon-like forks favoring particular DEs/etc, and
> as long as those forks contribute to our main tree I think that is
> good for all of us.
>
> Rich
>
>


-- 
Salut
alp
Sylvain

Reply via email to