On 17/12/2012 12:37, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> In short FEATURES=compressdebug should be stable and default before you
> (gentoo) decide for something like this.
> As mentioned somewhere else in this thread some packages are on the
> unbeareable side when compiled with debug information, those should
> default to filter out debug flags if not actually wanted by the user
> USE=gdb maybe?
> When going with debug information the best available should be used so
> -ggdb not -g if possible.
> Please try to understand the differences between the  various options
> (nodebug, -g, -ggdb) versus (time to build, memory needed, disk space)
> before attempting this.
> Diego maybe it's worth some runs in the tinderbox.

Again, I'm against using USE flags to handle debug information, it's
already hard enough as it is without adding extra complexity.

I'd be more for _suggesting_ the use of -g but leaving it to the user.
And yes I also agree that -ggdb makes more sense.

I'll write something about it later on I guess.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Reply via email to