On 15/06/2013 23:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:

"restrict+http:" (as suggested by the OP) is probably not enough
because it doesn't distinguish between fetch and mirror
restriction.

nofetch+http and nomirror+http ?

Or the other way around: {fetch,mirror}+http. I'd rather have RESTRICT
apply to all of SRC_URI (as it is now) and use the new syntax to
specify any exceptions from the restriction.

Ulrich



I like this idea.

Best regards,
Michael


Reply via email to