On 15/06/2013 23:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:"restrict+http:" (as suggested by the OP) is probably not enough because it doesn't distinguish between fetch and mirror restriction.nofetch+http and nomirror+http ?Or the other way around: {fetch,mirror}+http. I'd rather have RESTRICT apply to all of SRC_URI (as it is now) and use the new syntax to specify any exceptions from the restriction. Ulrich
I like this idea. Best regards, Michael