On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: > >> On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: > >>>> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > >>>> > >>>>> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide > >>>>> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember > >>>>> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the > >>>>> "package-by-package" proposal for others) > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, I am not sure if any other arch teams (sparc, ia64?) would want to > >>>>> get this policy too :| (I got ppc* because this concrete case ;)) > >>>> At first this is an arch team decision. No need for the council. > >>>> > >>>> (Given that in this case there is a responsive and addressable arch > >>>> team...) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> Andreas K. Huettel > >>>> Gentoo Linux developer > >>>> dilfri...@gentoo.org > >>>> http://www.akhuettel.de/ > >>>> > >>> The problem is that blueness looks to be the only member currently > >>> replying :/, I have checked their page and I see no team lead or > >>> similar. Then, I am not sure how to get the ok to proceed or not :| (to > >>> prevent this from getting stalled and we keep trying stabilizing all the > >>> things). > >>> > >>> I remember from older thread (one related with udev stabilization), that > >>> blueness was also the only one replying. > >>> > >>> > >> Yeah, not having a clear lead is a problem. No one wants to just make a > >> big decision on behalf of the team without making sure everyone is on > >> board. Pacho, do you have access to timberdoodle? If so, join both > >> teams and just take the initiative and let any other "claimants" step > >> forward now. BTW, taking the lead doesn't mean doing all the work > >> yourself. I want to see ppc/ppc64 in good shape. I'll be happy to > >> write scripts to do the demoting to ~ etc etc. > >> > > I don't even know about timberdoodle :( > > > > I forwarded the mail to both alias (as I forgot first time), then, > > hopefully they will review it :/ > > > > Will CC them again to this just now with this link to allow all to read > > the full thread: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92151 > > > > > > > > I think its clear who cares about ppc/ppc64. If there are no > objections, I'll take the lead of those teams and see this plan > through. I'll wait a few days for people to voice concerns. Then I'll > start by generating a list of all stable and testing packages on ppc and > ppc64. I'll post then and then continue the conversation on just the > ppc and ppc64 lists. Don't worry, I won't start dropping to ~ until we > have a concise plan and we're all on board. I don't think you can/should just take over the leadership of an arch. Why not have meeting/discussion for team members. Especially since you are proposing such a big change.
Thanks, -- Jack Morgan Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan <jmor...@gentoo.org>> Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B 761D 8E0A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
