On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 11:39 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > Even if we say it is the user's fault, then the problem of handling a > decompressor failure would still exist. The eclass does not gracefully > continue when decompressing the doc file, but instead it runs into a > die(). To address this we would need to make unpacker.eclass and > unpack() aware of nonfatal. The latter would require a PMS change. > > Or, I could duplicate unpack logic --- which is probably a lot to > account for the various compression options --- in the eclass. But I > suspect be both do not want that.
Perhaps this is the moment when you realize that there is no guarantee that unpacker.eclass and/or unpack will support the compression format set for docompress. The two were never intended to interact. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
