On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > >> First, thanks for the fix, hopefully not needed. >> >> It appears that the bug is in conf-update and not shadow so the rather >> brusque changing of the status of the shadow bug to "resolved" might be >> appropriate. But it would have been nice if they mentioned conf-update >> and neil's fix. > > The bug is not the same as I experienced. That problem is caused by not > running any updater, and there are circumstances in which this might > happen. My issue was cause by running a misbehaving updater.
Thanks for the clarification. allan
