Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not sure why..... Does anyone know why we need wpa_supplication now?
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and > potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry about the noise guys and > gals. It's been a while since I had such a scare.... > There are 4500 people coming into work tomorrow morning, and this > machine also happens to be our LDAP server. > > N. > > On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: >> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:38:23 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote: >> >>> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we >>> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked >>> away. For some reason it was stuck on ipr.h for some apache related >>> package, which was odd since apache is not installed on the machine. >>> I reset the system and poof!!!! Here I am at the co-location on Sunday >>> at 9:00am. >>> Serves me right I guess..... >>> >>> I double checked. When deleting 70-something rules and restarting the >>> machine they get regenerated. >> >> That's how udev-171 was supposed to work. You need to update to 200 then >> delete the file and it will stay deleted. >> >> You really need to read the news item and associated page CAREFULLY, then >> work through them CAREFULLY and the upgrade should do just what you want. >> >> udev, or whatever device manager you choose, is a critical system >> component, not the sort of thing you should leave to update itself >> without reading the instructions, especially on a remote server. >> >> >> -- >> Neil Bothwick >> >> MICROSOFT: Most Intelligent Customers Realize Our Software Only Fools >> Teenagers >> >
