On 2024-01-31, Thelma <the...@sys-concept.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/24 08:50, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2024-01-31, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Honestly, at this point I would not run any storage I cared about on
>>> anything but zfs.  There are just so many benefits.
>> 
>> I'll definitely put zfs on my list of things to play with.  I've been
>> a little reluctant in the past because it wasn't natively supported. I
>> don't use an initrd (or modules in general). So, using a filesystem
>> that isn't supported in-tree sounded like too much work.
>
> If zfs file system is superior to ext4 and it seems to it is.
> Why hasn't it been adopted more widely in Linux?

My understanding is that the license is incompatible with the Linux
kernel's GPL license, so it can't be "built-in" they way that ext4 is.

-- 
Grant


Reply via email to